Butterfly Effects and Continuing Great American Tragedies

Butterfly Effects and Continuing
Great American Tragedies

One of many relationships between the butterfly or ripple effects and great American tragedies, including those found at www.defraudingamerica.com and the related books written by government insiders, relates to the terrorist hijackings of four airliners on September 11, 2001. An understanding of this relationship could be your introduction to the endemic corruption and catastrophic events made possible by these cultures. Thousands of documents prove that the following conditions exist, many of them among the thousand-plus pages at the www.defraudingamerica.com Internet site and in the book, History of Aviation Disasters: 1950 to 9/11. (Print and e-book at amazon.com and other internet sources.) But this treasure trove of information is meaningless if you don't take time to read and understand the evidence:

Highlights of the documented corrupt acts resulting in the butterfly or ripple effects on September 11, 2001—and many other tragedies and catastrophic events—are described in part here.

  • Culture of corruption in the politics of aviation safety in the government's aviation safety offices, the most direct behind-the-scene blame for thousands of deaths in preventable and forewarned aviation disasters (that is not much different from the politics in other government entities). Details of this relationship can be found at the following Internet locations and in the book, History of Aviation Disasters: 1950 to 9/11.
     

    If these matters had not existed, many aviation disasters would not have happened, and thousands of people that suffered a horrorific end to their lives would have been spared their fate.


    Next in Line: People Who Were Paid to Perform Their Moral and Legal Responsibilities at Government
     A
    nd Non-Government Check and Balances
     

  • The history of cover-ups by people in control of virtually every check and balance in the United States, as recorded from 1965 to the present date. If any of them had met their moral and legal responsibilities, the crashes and deaths that followed could have been prevented as the publicity would have forced the removal of those engaged in arrogant and corrupt acts.
     
    • Member of Congress.
       
    • Department of Justice employees. The written notifications to DOJ employees started while federal airline safety inspector Rodney Stich was a key federal airline safety inspector and during and after acting similar to an independent prosecutor. The corruption that he discovered and officially reported were serious, and involved a continual series of major airline disasters during the period of frequent aviation disasters from 1950 to about 1985.
       
    • The nature of the criminal and often subversive activities included other areas of criminal misconduct as Stich became a national focal point for other former government agents and insiders seeking to report ongoing criminal activities involving key people in government that were affecting national security.
       
    • Media personnel.

    All of the above have a strong vested interest in continuing to cover up for the continuing corruption and often grave and catastrophic consequ3ences that they made possible.


    Next in Line: Federal Judges to Supreme Court Justices

    Under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, any person who knows of a federal crime must report it to a federal judge or other federal officer. That wording is specific. From 1970 to 2005, former federal agent Rodney Stich and his group of former federal agents and other insiders exercised that reposibility under the federal criminal statutes—and the responsibilities of any citizen. Stich filed documents in federal courts reporting the criminal activities (subversive in most cases) involving people in key overt and covert government operations, that they had discovered during their professional and official duties, and thereafter.

    Federal judges, up to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, had a mandatory duty to receive the information as part of their administrative duties, and as required by the federal crime reporting statute. Refusal to receive the information, or blocking the reporting of them, became multiple federal crimes.

    In addition to the repeated obstruction of justice crimes, these judges, numbering in the dozens, then direct and indirectly committed other crimes arising under inflicting harm to a person seeking to report a federal crime, a worse felony when the harm is inflicted upon a former federal agent. These harms included multiple acts occurring from approximately 1988 to 1996, included for instance:
     

    • Federal district and appellate judges issued a series of unlawful and unconstitutional orders that are still in effect that permanently bars the former federal agent from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. Those orders knowingly blocked the reporting of multiple areas of criminal activities that Stich and his other insiders sought to report.  By knowingly obstructing justice, the orders were crimes through obstructing justice. Those orders also protected the ongoing criminal activities—crimes against the United States—some of which continued the series of aviation disasters, the latest being the hijacking of four airliners, killing nearly 3,000 people, and continuing into even worse areas.
       

    • Federal judges at Sacramento, California, and Justice Department prosecutors (under U.S. Attorney David Levi—promoted to federal judge thereafter) charged the former federal agent with criminal contempt of court for filing papers in federal court seeking to report the ongoing criminal activities and seeking an order to halt the parallel sham and illegal actions by a hoard of lawyers and law firms that involved multiple violations of state and federal laws. Those violations were aided and abetted by a series of California judge.
       

    • Federal judges denied the former federal agent a constitutionally required jury trial, and then sentenced him to six months in federal prison. (That action resulted in the former federal agent meeting numerous former CIA personnel that had been falsely charged to silence them concerning other areas of high level corruption.) The irony was that he was charged and sentenced for seeking to report high-level criminal activities in which the same Department of Justice employees and federal judges were themselves implicated as accessory after the fact and accessory during the fact—being the criminal activities that were discovered and reported.
       

    • While in prison, federal judges and  Department of Justice trustees seized and liquidated Stich's $10 million in assets that funded his attempts to expose and halt the widespread corruption. The seizure violated numerous federal and constitutional protections. The primary federal judges were Las Vegas Robert Jones and Oakland, California Edward Jellen. Every federal judge at the district and appellate court level upheld this seizure, as did the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.
       

    • Federal judge Edward Jellen in Oakland, California, charged Stich with criminal contempt of court and sentenced him to federal prison for filing objections to the seizure and liquidation of his life assets that occurred without the legal required notice of hearing, a hearing, and legally required cause.

    • Other federal judges charging Stich with criminal contempt of court were San Francisco judges Marilyn Petal and Vaughn Walker.
       

  • All of the above were repeatedly reported via legal filings to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, from about 1982 to 2005. The Justices became complicit in the conspiracy that had grave consequences for the United States, including the 9/11 hijackings, the resulting actions taken thereafter, and years of tragedies prior to that point.
     

  • The only justice that at least did not directly become complicit was Supreme Court Justice Bryon White. He wrote a personal letter to Stich explaining that by himself, there was nothing he could do, implying that all the other Justices were preventing actions being taken.


Next in Line: Hoard of Lawyers and Law firms

Parallel to the actions by Department of Justice employees and federal judges were a hoard of lawyers and law firms, several of which had known ties to the CIA and FBI, including the San Francisco law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross. Their series of sham legal actions, all of which violated dozens of state and federal laws and were barred by statutes, acted to halt the attempts by Stich and his group by through sham lawsuits, helping to strip Stich of the assets that funded these activities, and diverting Stich's corruption reporting activities. The first sham lawsuit was filed in the state courts at Fairfield, California. Every one of over a dozen California judges protected the CIA group and scheme. Despite the sham action being barred by statute and depriving the judges of subject and personal matter jurisdiction, they repeatedly ordered Stich to pay thousands of dollars in sanctions for filing due process defenses and protected the CIA-related lawyers.

One group of lawyers, also with CIA association, were the lawyers and law firm in South Carolina, who used a possible wife murderer to act as plaintiff in a sham legal action seeking to seize the books exposing these matters.

Their actions were then continued by Los Angeles lawyers and law firms.


What Does All This Mean to You, The
American People, the Nation, and their Future?

What has been stated is just one segment of the documented corruption that an arrogant, criminal, and literal secret group in government has been doing to the American public, using the public as somewhat of a feeding trough.

One of many victims is shown in the following picture, a woman jumping to her death from the World Trade Center as a result of the hijackings of airliners on September 11, 2001

No One in the Chain of Corruption Had Anything But Contempt for The Nation and the Lives
That Would Continue to be Lost

Her death is only one of nearly 3,000 that occurred on that date that would not have happened if any one of the people involved in the above actsor those who knew of the acts—had the decency and courage to help expose these matters that were causing such grief upon the nation. Nor the deaths associated with invading Afghanistan (another act based on fraud), the deaths associated with invading Iraq (another act based on fraud), nor the thousands of other deaths in forewarned and preventable aviation disasters, or harm in other areas, affecting the American people, the nation, people of other nations affected by the endemic corruption and cover-ups rampant in the United States, have occurred. The people that are guilty and have a responsibility for these tragedies are all doing very well, with many of them still in key government positions.

Nor would these horrific acts have occurred if enough American people had cared to read material provided by insiders describing various areas of corruption. They were too busy with trivia. Those that do protest address trivial matters that require virtually no level of intelligence, no reading history, and no exercise of courage.

The future for Americans is surely grim. The availability of nuclear devices, the resulting great hatred for Americans, and the many other areas in which those who hate Americans can bring about death, is almost unlimited. The people that we have caused to hate usmore than in any time in the world's historyhave yet to use the many terrorist tactics that will affect everyone. For this, there is no absolute defense.

Most of those who have fought so long, and suffered, trying to stop these horrific ripple effects have either already passed away or are now reaching the end of their lives. Or have given up.

There is some hope, now with the Internet and people's ability to spread the information and circumvent the mainstream media cover-ups, some reduction can be made in the self-inflicted catastrophic events.

But even this is doubtful with the large percentage of people thinking the need for a nation's president is simply a smile, ignoring the pathetic lack of experience and common sense.


 

 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.