Lockerbie intrigue: an insight into greatest source of harm for Americans
Evidence of Far Worse Problem for Americans
Than the present Political MattersWhile most of the American public is obsessed with political trivia, the primary cause of most American problems, the endemic corruption and endemic cover-ups, go totally ignored. The following is one of many areas that would give the herd-like American public an insight into what is really being done to them, by whom, and how the culture is responsible for most of Americans greatest threats and source of harm. This can of worms centers on the frenzy over the release of the Lockerbie "bomber" and one of the greatest and most sordid hoaxes inflicted upon the media-dumbed-down American public.
The Real Reason for the Release of the Libyan “Bomber”?
Scottish authorities released from prison the Libyan bomber on the humanitarian ground that he had less than 90 days to live due to prostate cancer. After several highly qualified physicians testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (September 29, 2010) that no physician would have concluded that the Libyan “bomber” had only 90 days to live, based upon the medical reports, the question arises, what was the actual reason for the Libyan’s release.
Typical of the testimony provided by highly respected physicians to the Senate panel included the following examples:
“Any physician with training and experience in prostate cancer would find a three month prognosis for a patient in Mr. Al-Megrahi’s condition difficult to believe and possibly even ridiculous.”
The answer to that is obvious to anyone having access to the massive evidence withheld from the American public.
In the United States the release of the Libyan “bomber” created outrage1 that someone committing such an atrocious act should be set free. The release brought about charges, in the United States, that the murderer of 270 people, mostly Americans, resulted from pressure by British Petroleum (BP).
The Physician Testimony Proved that the
90-Days-of-Life Humanitarian Release was Bogus
Anyone who knows the facts behind the Lockerbie bombing trial knows the humanitarian ground release was bogus. The medical testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee provided further proof to those not aware of the facts. The real reason for the release of the Libyan “bomber” on the false humanitarian grounds is obvious from the sequestered evidence not generally available to the American public
For the U.S., Be Careful of What You Wish For!
It is in the United States that the major outrage exists about the release of the Libyan “bomber,” and it is the United States that would suffer the most harm if the Libyan “bomber” had not been released. Briefly the reasons, the facts, and the evidence that must be withheld from the “herd.”
The Key Reasons for the 90-day-to-live Humanitarian Release
In September 2009, the appeal for al Megrahi was about to be heard. If that appeal had gone forward, the most sordid details would have been revealed by the evidence that would have first implicated Scottish personnel. And even worse, the criminal acts by United States government personnel. To avoid the public learning about the most sordid conduct ever associated with a major aviation disaster. Scottish officials gave al Megrahi the option of dropping his appeal and in return receive the bogus “humanitarian release.
Major Scandals Revealed if Bogus Release Did not Occur
The evidence that would have been presented at that appeal would have revealed the following major scandals among others:
-
Scottish trial and appeal judges cooperated in a scheme to shifting the blame from Iran and the Syrian-based PFLP group to two innocent parties: Libya and al Megrahi.
-
Scottish prosecutors used the false evidence presented to them by FBI-DOJ personnel to carry out this scheme.
-
FBI-DOJ personnel planted bogus evidence at the crash scene months after the bombing to shift blame from the actual murderers to falsely charge Libya. That planted evidence was a half-thumbnail-size timer fragment found in a muddy field miles from the main wreckage. (That “evidence” was acquired from a former employee of the Swiss manufacturer, Mebo.) That was the only evidence that enabled the scheme to continue.
-
FBI-DOJ personnel offered $4 million to the owner of the company that produced the timer mechanism to provide perjured testimony—who refused to become implicated in the criminal scheme.
-
FBI-DOJ personnel obtained that timer device from an employee of the Mebo manufacturer, who was unaware of what was to be done with the timer fragment.
-
FBI-DOJ personnel paid $3 million to a small Malta shopkeeper and his brother to falsely testify about the identity of the purchaser of children's clothes allegedly found in the suitcase containing the alleged bomb, which was allegedly ignited by the planted timer fragment.
-
FBI-DOJ personnel paid a discredited CIA informant over $1 million to provide false testimony about the identity of two Libyans that allegedly put an unaccompanied bomb-carrying suitcase on a flight departing Malta, which was allegedly transferred to another aircraft at Frankfurt, and then transferred to Pan Am Flight 103 at London’s Heathrow Airport. That scenario required that the unaccompanied suitcase pass undetected through five security check points.
-
FBI-DOJ personnel falsely charged two Libyans with the murder of 270 people, while covering up for the Syrian-based group that committed the murders under contract with Iran to avenge the U.S. Navy shooting down of an Iranian airliner that killed 290 people.
The Evidence Proving the Existence of This Scheme
The prima facie evidence that would have been presented during the appeal, that would have shown the details of this scheme, included, for instance, the following:
-
The sworn affidavit by the former employee for the Swiss company stating that he gave the half-thumbnail-size timer mechanism to FBI agents, months after the bombing, which was then planted in a muddy field miles from the main wreckage, miraculously discovered and retrieved, and then represented as the triggering mechanism for the bomb. That sequence was then used to falsely charge Libya with the murder of 270 people, claiming that the timer was sold by a Swiss company to Libya.
-
The sworn affidavit by the co-owner of the Swiss company that produced the timer, stating that (a) the timer presented during the Lockerbie trial was not the type of timer sold to Libya; (b) that he had been offered $4 million by FBI agents to falsely testify that the timer shown to him was sold to Libya. (That occurred before he learned that a former employee had given a timer fragment to FBI agents).
-
Scottish judges that blocked the most important testimony about the tiny thumbnail size timer that was the only evidence and which was planted to shift the attention from the actual murderers to Libya. The Lockerbie judges blocked the co-owner of the small Swiss Company, the only person with the knowledge, from providing testimony that the timer was not one sold to Libya. That type of obstruction of justice tactic was repeated several times by the Scottish trial and appellate judges, which then protected the criminal obstruction of justice type of conduct by FBI-DOJ personnel and Scottish prosecutors.
-
Small-town Scottish police, under guidance by FBI-DOJ personnel, continued the scheme orchestrated by FBI-DOJ personnel. After the trial, Scottish investigators reported planting of evidence and other tactics to support the original scheme concocted by FBI-DOJ personnel.
-
The FBI forensic expert who testified about the timer fragment was later fired for producing false forensic reports.
-
Dozens of reports by Professor Hans Koechler, the representative appointed by the United Nations Security Council, to monitor the Lockerbie bombing trial and appeal procedures. He detailed the gross irregularities, absence of evidence, and other misconduct.
-
The reports by Professor Robert Black, Edinburgh University, the architect of the Lockerbie trial at Camp Zeist in the Netherlands. He repeatedly reported the gross irregularities during the investigation, prosecution, trial, and appeal proceedings.
-
The hundreds of British and Scottish media reports providing details of the massive misconduct and obstruction of justice.
-
Additional evidence discovered by this writer, being the report in a multi-page Department of Defense document accurately identifying the Syrian-based PFLP group and Iran as the perpetrators of the Lockerbie bombing. Excerpts from that report are at an Internet site and also in the documentary book, “Lockerbie to 9/11: Massive Fraud and Consequence.
-
Hundreds of British and Scottish media reports.
Why U.S. Government Personnel Will Never
Reveal the Sordid Conduct to the American Public
There are many reasons why members of Congress, the White House politicians, or officials in the U.S. Department of Justice will never reveal this series of sordid and criminal acts to the American public. A sampling of reasons:
-
The culture carried out by DOJ employees not only protected the actual terrorists, allowing them to continue terrorist attacks against U.S. targets, but then enabled to occur a series of catastrophic terrorist successes starting with the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, where even worse corrupt acts took place. (See the books, Lockerbie to 9/11: Massive Fraud and Consequences; History of Aviation Disasters: 1950 to 9/11; and Crimes of the BI-DOJ, Mafia, and al Qaeda.) Also, files at:
-
The history of cover-ups by members of Congress that made possible many of the worst catastrophic events affecting the American People.
Endemic and Deadly Culture Entirely Unknown to the American Herd
-
A culture of endemic corruption and cover-ups adversely affecting the American people and the national security that is totally outside the radar of most Americans, who are solely focused on political ideology, Lady Gaga, Tiger Woods, and other trivia.
The presentation of this important information is an exercise in futility!!

You write -
'Anyone who knows the facts behind the Lockerbie bombing trial knows the humanitarian ground release was bogus.'
and
'Scottish officials gave al Megrahi the option of dropping his appeal and in return receive the bogus humanitarian release.'
The release of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi was anything but bogus. All that you are doing by writing that is letting your imagination run riot and fantasising about things that never happened.
Here are some facts -
5 May 2009 - Application received from Libyan Government requesting prisoner of al-Megrahi under the Prisoner Transfer Agreement.
24 July 2009 - Application received from Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi requesting release on compassionate grounds.
3 August 2009 - Decision on prisoner transfer of al-Megrahi under the PTA expected.
5 August 2009 - Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill MSP, meets Mr al-Megrahi at Greenock Prison in accordance with the process set out in the PTA.
20 August 2009 - Decision made to release Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds.
Whilst Mr al-Megrahi applied for, and was granted by the High Court, permission to abandon his second appeal this action was only necessary with regard to the Prisoner Transfer Agreement but NOT for release on compassionate grounds. It was a requirement of the PTA that ALL connected legal proceedings be terminated - at this stage the Crown still had an appeal outstanding and its appeal only fell by default when Mr al-Megrahi was released.
'Information relating to decision on Mr Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi' can be found at -
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Justice/legal/lockerbie
If you really want facts about the trial
at Camp Zeist and the bombing I refer you to the following -
'THE LOCKERBIE DISASTER'
http://plane-truth.com/Aoude/geocities/roblack2.html
'THE LOCKERBIE TRIAL AND APPEAL'
http://knol.google.com/k/robert-black/the-lockerbie-trial-and-appeal/178khla0op77w/2
'LOCKERBIE PRE-TRIAL REVIEW NOTES'
http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_78700_en.pdf
I also suggest the blog 'THE LOCKERBIE CASE' (www.lockerbiecase.blogspot.com). This blog is written by Robert Black QC, the 'architect' of the trial at Camp Zeist.
Reply to this