Target on Back of Whistleblower: Blowback Effects Upon American Public
Categories: American politicians, American public
Target on Back of Whistleblower Exposing
High-Level Corruption—With Public Paying the Consequences
Former federal agent Rodney Stich has for many years taken unprecedented actions seeking to halt the continuing consequences from the high-level corruption that he and his coalition of dozens of former intelligence, law enforcement, and aviation safety personnel, and other professionals, had initially discovered during their time in government. The extraordinary actions taken by Stich has provided a huge amount of documentary evidence of the systemic corruption, the sometimes horrific consequences, and the corrupt actions taken against him to prevent exposing the corruption. In effect, he has had a target on his back for many years.
The worse of the attacks occurred after the former federal agent exercised the right to report the corrupt activities to federal judges under the federal crime reporting statute. Not only did a long list of federal judges block the reports, but then misused their judicial positions, with Department of Justice employees, to viciously attack the person seeking to halt the continuing series of tragedies. Day in and day out, from 1982 to 2005, he was adversely affected by the misuse of government power by the same people that were enablers to great American tragedies:
Such a large amount of evidence accumulated from these multiple attacks that the accumulation of evidence indicated that a powerful force was orchestrating and protected the participants that came from the most important and fundamental sections of government and the legal fraternity. IF understood, it would reveal probably the most expansive criminal conspiracy involving primary parties in any modern nation today. The following are a sampling of what was done and what is fully documented:
-
Voiding constitutional due process and protections.
-
Federal judges and Justice Department personnel filed several criminal contempt of court charges against the former federal agent for having attempted to report the corrupt activities involving people in the CIA, the Department of Justice, and the FAA.
-
Federal judges denied Stich the constitutional right to a jury trial, and sentenced him to six months in federal prison. That sentence was carried out using every possible brutal tactic, including placing him in solitary confinement for two months, a condition that some call torture and unconstitutional. He was 69 years of age at that time and had recently undergone quadruple open heart surgery.
-
Upon the day of his release, two federal judges in San Francisco, Marilyn Petal and Vaughn Walker, charged him again with criminal contempt of court for having sought to report the high-level corruption, and he was briefly incarcerated, after which he was confined to six months of house arrest.
-
While in prison, federal judges and Department of Justice trustees, with the participation of cooperating lawyers, seized and liquidated the $10 million in assets that had funded his exposing whistleblower activities. That seizure and liquidation violated the legal and constitutional requirement of a notice of hearing, a hearing, and legally required cause.
-
When Stich filed a legally provided objection, Oakland federal judge Edward Jellen charged him with criminal contempt of court and sentenced him again to prison.
-
Dozens of federal judges repeatedly blocked the reporting of the serious criminal activities associated with major national consequences. These were criminal acts and enabled to occur deadly and catastrophic consequences, of which the 9/11 hijackings were simply one-day's consequences among others.
-
Federal district and appellate judges issued illegal and unconstitutional orders permanently barring the former federal agent and whistleblower from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. Those orders knowingly barred him and his coalition of other former government agents from reporting the conduct constituting crimes against the United States and also barred Stich from defending against the litany of sham lawsuits filed by a hoard of lawyers from 1982 to 2005.
Paradoxically, the same people in positions to protect national interests were spending taxpayer money to fund the attacks that silence an unusual whistleblower—and in the process make possible a long list of tragic, deadly, and catastrophic consequences for the American public, national security, and the lives of people in other countries.
As the former federal agent stated during his FAA employment in the 1960s when he was forced to act similar to an independent prosecutor, he wrote in his closing brief that am cover-up will allow the corruption and deadly consequences to continue. And it has, with a vengeance, as seen by one-day's consequences on September 11, 2001. For those viewers able to concentrate on more than the 140 character limit on Twitter, the following provides insight into a couple of many other major scandals:
You have now had an introduction to the most corruption-riddled of the major five nations. If enough people would show the courage of the Egyptians and Tunisians, the United States can slowly return to the great nation that it once was.
The consequences of the high-level corruption affected the American people kin different ways. Some were financial, as in the housing and financial implosion that reached the public's attention in 2008; the arrest and imprisonment of many innocent people over the years; or in a physically brutal and horrific manner. see the pictures and remainder of this site at www.defraudingamerica.com/target_on_back_whistleblower.html. Have a good day!
You see the images that the public is demanding. Why more reality-based TV? You'd think that after the first Survivor it would have gone away, but it hasn't. The public demands it because they get all caught up in the personal stories, and want to see more and more.
Reply to this