Fallacy of Taking Off Cardboard-Thin Ladies Shoes At Airport Security Points

An example of the absurdity, and sometimes tragic consequences, of the standard practice of placing unqualified people in key positions. like the Department of Homeland Security, is the requirement of removing millions of shoes every year by people going through airport security. Many shoes worn by women have soles almost cardboard-thin, and the most damage an explosive-laden shoe would cause would be damage to the wearer's foot.

Compare this alleged danger that requires millions of shoe removals to the much bigger existing problem of a far greater amount of explosives that could be hidden in a Kotex sanitary menstrual pad, or more in incontinence pads

This isn't revealing any secrets to people angry with U.S. foreign policies that want to blow up U.S. aircraft; they certainly are smarter than U.S. political appointees in charge of security. The only danger of pointing out this danger is that these political appointees may now require people wearing Kotex sanitary napkins or incontinence garments to disrobe and have these undergarments examined!

The point here is that the task of removing millions of shoes every year at security check points is a waste of time, doesn't improve aviation safety, and another indication of the incompetence that comes with placing unqualified people into sensitive positions as part of the standard political process in the United States.

The U.S. practice of putting non-qualified people in key decision-making positions is that deadly consequences occur. This has been the case for decades in the Federal Aviation Administration, responsible for aviation safety, including protection against aviation terrorism. In the matter of Hurricane Katrina, the consequences of unqualified political appointees was clear.

www.defraudingamerica.com/faa_index.html.